Two items caught my eye today that neatly juxtapose. One is from California, which discusses the publication of hospital charges (retail sticker price) for surgeries, and the hospital's insistence that these prices are meaningless. The other is from a Families USA study counting how many people were without health insurance for some period in 2008.
"That database is meaningless," said Jim Lott of the Hospital Association of Southern California. "There’s no relationship between the price on that list and what your insurance company has negotiated."
OK, fair enough. So how many people *didn't* have insurance, and thereby didn't have the benefit of a negotiated rate?
Turns out in California, during 2007 and 2008, 37.4% of the population under 65 spent some time without health insurance. Of these, 76.9% were without health insurance for six months or more.
80.2% of all people who went without health insurance were members of working families, i.e., someone at the house has a job. i.e., employment does not mean health insurance.
Most interestingly, 26.2% of uninsured people have incomes at or above 200% of the federal poverty level. I would hazard a guess that these folks are not rushing to claim bankruptcy to avoid the bill.
And of course, *all* these people are subject to the meaningless numbers. They all are charged sticker price. Maybe they don't pay them, but someone does, either through direct write-offs which impact us at the local tax level (we pay it for them) or indirectly through these folks becoming indigent.
Sticker prices hurt all of us. They are not meaningless. I myself have been charged them, even with my PPO in place.
I, like many other folk in public reporting, would prefer to report the cost of care - how much it costs a hospital to perform a given procedure - but this data is still hidden from us.
In the meantime, and even if I were to have cost data in hand, I would still publish charges, because charges most certainly do mean something, and they mean something to an ever-growing portion of the population.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Uninsured and Charges
Posted by Jaz at 12:08 PM
Labels:
commentary
Social: DiggIt!
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Disclosures and Disclaimers
Disclosures
My employer is compensated through funding to provide analytical research, technology solutions, and Web-based public and private health care performance reports by the State of New York, the State of Illinois, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Commonwealth Fund and Bridges to Excellence. I am not being compensated by any of these organisations to create articles for or make edits to this Web site or any other medium; and all posts authored by me are as an individual and do not represent my employer or the agencies I work for.
2 comments:
Gotta love it when you can't get basic information like how much something costs. How much is that car? Not important.
As the number of uninsured Americans increases, and it becomes more cost efficient to travel abroad to get medical care, medical tourism is increasing.
http://www.health-tourism.com/ is a Medical Tourism Directory that strives to provide people with the most accurate, thorough and up to date information on medical facilities abroad.
We would appreciate it if you would mention our comprehensive medical tourism site in your blog, or write a review about us.
If you have any questions, please contact us at support@health-tourism.com
Post a Comment